Version 3.0
Trust is CurrencyApplication: We don’t believe in hiding our markup from clients, or our Free Agent professionals. Free Agent Source fees paid by Free Agents, and billable rates paid by clients will always be visible to all three parties: Clients (business customers), Free Agents (contractors), and Free Agent Source staff. Theory: Transparency not only ensures accountability of all parties to each other, but it means all parties remain open to effective criticism to improve our processes. Transparency means no one has to work with less information than they’d demand if they owned the companyTransparency leads to trust. And trust is stronger than bank credit. We do business on trust. We trade on trust. And the more we all experience successful transactions, the more we prosper. Control and hidden facts raise concerns about “losing”. They are like trade barriers which are impediments to successful business.. |
|
![]() |
Freedom is ValueApplication: We avoid imposing unnecessary limitations on Free Agents and client relationships. Temp to hire is fine, leaving when you want is fine. Theory: Control isn’t necessary to exchange value. Freedom creates conditions for spontaneous project teams, or even new businesses. Restricting the relationship would mean saying no to innovation and growth. |
|
![]() |
Sustainability is CoreThose who are pushing the envelope on green use of resources do so not just because it’s good and right, but because it’s a core indicator of how efficient they are. In other words, it’s a measure of their effectiveness as companies, startups, teams, and entrepreneurs. We’re committed to constantly seeking ways to trim our processes, and this makes us not only a greener organization, but the kind of highly effective lean outfit we always wanted to work for. |
|
(It’s what the tree is saying.) |
Technology is PropheticThe growth of a number of technologies tells us how we will work in the 21st century. The “wisdom of crowds” is perceptible in social technologies like the green movement, the lifehacking ethos, digital nomads, and coworking. Likewise, we draw incredible lessons from information technology, marketing, and industry development, whether that’s the growth of cloud computing, The open source model, the design movement, supply chain economics, lean project management, web 2.0, Creative Commons, distance learning, and social media. We’re constantly conceptualizing what work can be. In that sense, this is truly Work 2.0 |
|
![]() |
Work is CultureWe find a global movement of people asking the question “how can work be different?” Whether it’s laid off professionals who don’t want to stake everything on yet another volatile job, vagabonds and digital nomads pushing the envelope of separating work from location, or small business startups asking how they can modularize the core waste centers in a company as ‘mechanical turks’. We don’t know all the answers, but one of the things we take from crowdsourcing and social marketing is the understanding that we will find answers together as part of a community. |
|
![]() |
Misfits are ContributorsWeirdness holds incredible talent, and oddballs are outliers who often bring extreme contributions. The tattoo, the earring, the beard aren’t what’s important. The same goes for where you are in life. We want the home workers, semi-retired, soldiers coming home, second career types, part-timers, laid off, part-time working moms, late bloomers, because you’re a source of genius. |
|
![]() |
Tradition is VulnerableAs small business owners, entrepreneurs, and contractors, we realize we are not too big to fail, but we still want the freedom to direct our own activities. Continually hacking tradition and constant experimentation is how we construct the tools that keep us free. By utilizing powerful business tools that traditional employees have in the world’s most advanced corporations, we can sustain the renaissance of small business by competing with the big guys, and ensure our survival and freedom. The first step, for us, was to create the company we wanted to work for, because we saw an economy of employment relationships stuck in the 1950s and unable to survive in the 21st century. We knew it could be different. |
|
![]() |





