FAS vs. Being an Employer

linkedin FAS vs. Being an Employergoogle plus FAS vs. Being an Employertechnorati FAS vs. Being an Employerslashdot FAS vs. Being an Employershare save 120 16 FAS vs. Being an Employer

Cost of Being an Employer: 40%

  • Annual Accounting Costs
  • Annual Attorney Fees & Registered Agent Fees
  • General and/or Professional Liability Insurance
  • Workers’ Comp Insurance, including the monthly payroll report & annual audit.
  • Minimum Corporate Tax
  • Employer Taxes for Social Security & Medicare
  • Payroll close costs, including preparation, review, transmit to direct deposit, tax payments, report to the 401k plan & software licensing
  • 401k plan fees & matching

Staffing Agency Fees: 50% or more

  • Markup sometimes gets to 75%. Yikes!
  • No transparency for the company on what the agency pays the professional
  • No transparency for the professional on the agency markup to the company
  • Usually minimum term lengths
  • Sometimes exclusivity requirement or minimum placements
  • Partial, poor or no benefits for professionals
  • Sense of transience among professionals looking for traditional employment status
  • Recruiting usually can’t be unbundled from staffing – so duplication of internal resources

Cost with Free Agent Source: 20%

Pay your people 20% over current salary or rates. This allows them to cover their costs with Free Agent Source. In exchange:

  • No Employer Costs
  • No Staffing Agency Gouging (50%+ markup)
  • No Agency Fees at all to FAS
  • No Minimum Number of People
  • No Minimum Term Length

RECRUITING: You save even more because (unlike with a staffing agency), you do your own recruiting or, if you prefer, we can refer you to independent recruiters that partner with us – another ‘just in time’ service.

Coming Soon: We’re currently building a table that lets you plug in your numbers and see the difference.

Bear